# Coturn vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Coturn scores 71/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.

Coturn is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-openreader