# Coturn vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 14 528 | 93 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 | +58 012 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-omnivoice-studio