CoturnvsMDD Sim Gateway
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | MDD Sim Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #11 of 16 in VoIP |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 677 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.14.0 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 53/100 for MDD Sim Gateway, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MDD Sim Gateway.
If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; MDD Sim Gateway needs more configuration.
Coturn is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →MDD Sim Gateway details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep MDD Sim Gateway, compare it with