# Coturn vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 132 699 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +3 244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1465 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-llamacpp