# Coturn vs Kokoro FastAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | Kokoro FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 ✓ | 5 612 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +135 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Coturn scores 71/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-kokoro-fastapi