# Coturn vs Janus WebRTC Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | Janus WebRTC Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #9 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 ✓ | 9 197 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 ✓ | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Coturn scores 71/100 against 70/100 for Janus WebRTC Server, so it is the safer default.

Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Janus WebRTC Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.

Coturn is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [Janus WebRTC Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/janus-webrtc-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-janus-webrtc-server