# Coturn vs InvokeAI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | InvokeAI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #2 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 28 911 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +625 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.

Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for InvokeAI.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.

InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-invokeai