Coturnvsfluxer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | fluxer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #6 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 10 697 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +341 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1038 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | fluxer-users@2026.1028.183805 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn and fluxer score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
fluxer ships more often: 1038 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.
If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; fluxer needs more configuration.
fluxer is growing faster right now (+341 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →fluxer details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep fluxer, compare it with