# Corteza vs RabbitMQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Corteza | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 2 183 | 13 949 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +78 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Corteza, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Corteza.

If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; Corteza needs more configuration.

RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Corteza](https://selfhost.directory/project/corteza) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/corteza.md)
- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/corteza-vs-rabbitmq