# Corteza vs nocobase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Corteza | nocobase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 2 183 | 24 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +428 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 75 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v2.2.35 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocobase scores 78/100 against 61/100 for Corteza, so it is the safer default.

nocobase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Corteza.

If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; Corteza needs more configuration.

nocobase is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Corteza](https://selfhost.directory/project/corteza) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/corteza.md)
- [nocobase](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocobase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/corteza-vs-nocobase