corootvsRootprint
Two self-hosted Datadog alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coroot | Rootprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #6 of 13 in Log Management |
| GitHub stars | 7 993 | 439 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.28.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Svelte |
Which one should you pick?
coroot scores 69/100 against 49/100 for Rootprint, so it is the safer default.
coroot ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Rootprint.
coroot is growing faster right now (+58 stars in 30 days).
coroot details →Rootprint details → All Datadog alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep coroot, compare it with
Keep Rootprint, compare it with