# coroot vs Rejourney

> Two self-hosted [Datadog alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/datadog), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coroot | Rejourney |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #16 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 7 995 ✓ | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.28.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | unity-v0.1.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

coroot scores 69/100 against 46/100 for Rejourney, so it is the safer default.

coroot ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rejourney.

If you want the quickest setup, coroot is easier to run; Rejourney needs more configuration.

coroot is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coroot](https://selfhost.directory/project/coroot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coroot.md)
- [Rejourney](https://selfhost.directory/project/rejourney) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rejourney.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coroot-vs-rejourney