# coroot vs logtide

> Two self-hosted [Datadog alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/datadog), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coroot | logtide |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #9 of 13 in Log Management |
| GitHub stars | 7 992 ✓ | 457 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.28.1 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

coroot scores 69/100 against 48/100 for logtide, so it is the safer default.

coroot ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for logtide.

coroot is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coroot](https://selfhost.directory/project/coroot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coroot.md)
- [logtide](https://selfhost.directory/project/logtide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/logtide.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coroot-vs-logtide