corednsvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; coredns needs more configuration.
coredns is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →Typecho details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep Typecho, compare it with