# coredns vs Trenova

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | Trenova |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 400 ✓ | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.

coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Trenova.

If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.

coredns is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [Trenova](https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-trenova