corednsvsTdarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | Tdarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Makefile |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; coredns needs more configuration.
coredns details →Tdarr details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep Tdarr, compare it with