corednsvsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
coredns details →Standard Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with