corednsvsShiny Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | Shiny Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 763 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 57/100 for Shiny Server, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shiny Server.
If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; Shiny Server needs more configuration.
coredns is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →Shiny Server details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep Shiny Server, compare it with