# coredns vs ScreenTinker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | ScreenTinker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

coredns is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-screentinker