# coredns vs rtmp-hls-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | rtmp-hls-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #46 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 400 ✓ | 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 42/100 for rtmp-hls-server, so it is the safer default.

coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rtmp-hls-server.

If you want the quickest setup, rtmp-hls-server is easier to run; coredns needs more configuration.

coredns is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [rtmp-hls-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/rtmp-hls-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rtmp-hls-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-rtmp-hls-server