# coredns vs quackback

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | quackback |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 ✓ | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for coredns.

coredns is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-quackback