# coredns vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for coredns.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; coredns needs more configuration.

coredns is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-qm-music