corednsvsPrysm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | Prysm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
coredns is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →Prysm details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep Prysm, compare it with