# coredns vs OpenSlides

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | OpenSlides |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 3 in Conference Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 ✓ | 661 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 4.3.6 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 56/100 for OpenSlides, so it is the safer default.

OpenSlides ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for coredns.

If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; OpenSlides needs more configuration.

coredns is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [OpenSlides](https://selfhost.directory/project/openslides) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openslides.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-openslides