corednsvsOpenSlides
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | OpenSlides | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 3 in Conference Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 661 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 4.3.6 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 56/100 for OpenSlides, so it is the safer default.
OpenSlides ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for coredns.
If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; OpenSlides needs more configuration.
coredns is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →OpenSlides details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep OpenSlides, compare it with