corednsvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →OctoBot details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep OctoBot, compare it with