# coredns vs Haraka

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | Haraka |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #6 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 ✓ | 5 627 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 ✓ | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.

Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for coredns.

coredns is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [Haraka](https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-haraka