corednsvsFish Speech
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | Fish Speech | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 14 400 | 33 454 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →Fish Speech details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with