corednsvsdocker-dyndns
Two self-hosted DNS projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | docker-dyndns | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 41 in DNS | #35 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 14 427 | 18 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 33/100 for docker-dyndns, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for docker-dyndns.
coredns is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
Key differences
- License: coredns is Apache-2.0, docker-dyndns is MIT.
- Platforms only coredns lists: Linux.
- Features only coredns lists: Access control lists, Authoritative zone serving from files, DNS64 IPv6 translation, Forwarding to upstream resolvers and 11 more.
- Features only docker-dyndns lists: Basic Authentication, BIND9 authoritative DNS, CNAME support, Configurable TTL and 6 more.
coredns details →docker-dyndns details →All DNS projects →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep docker-dyndns, compare it with