# coredns vs DeepSeek Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | DeepSeek Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 264 906 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +8 914 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 76/100 for coredns, so it is the safer default.

coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-deepseek-harness