# coredns vs deceptifeed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | deceptifeed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #59 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.69.0 · 14 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 43/100 for deceptifeed, so it is the safer default.

coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for deceptifeed.

coredns is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [deceptifeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/deceptifeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deceptifeed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-deceptifeed