# coredns vs d2c.sh

> Two self-hosted [DNS projects](https://selfhost.directory/dns), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | coredns | d2c.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #31 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 ✓ | 228 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

coredns scores 76/100 against 41/100 for d2c.sh, so it is the safer default.

coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for d2c.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, d2c.sh is easier to run; coredns needs more configuration.

coredns is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [coredns](https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coredns.md)
- [d2c.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/d2c-sh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/d2c-sh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coredns-vs-d2c-sh