# core-keeper-dedicated vs RomM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | core-keeper-dedicated | RomM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #34 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 238 | 14 126 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +970 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.8.1 · 27 Feb 2026 | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

RomM scores 81/100 against 49/100 for core-keeper-dedicated, so it is the safer default.

RomM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for core-keeper-dedicated.

If you want the quickest setup, core-keeper-dedicated is easier to run; RomM needs more configuration.

RomM is growing faster right now (+970 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [core-keeper-dedicated](https://selfhost.directory/project/core-keeper-dedicated) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/core-keeper-dedicated.md)
- [RomM](https://selfhost.directory/project/romm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/romm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/core-keeper-dedicated-vs-romm