# copyparty vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 47 173 ✓ | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-zigbee2mqtt