# copyparty vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 177 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +394 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+394 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-ytdlpwebplayer