copypartyvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 184 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with