copypartyvswikmd
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | wikmd | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 8 in Documentation Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.10.7 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 45/100 for wikmd, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wikmd.
If you want the quickest setup, wikmd is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →wikmd details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep wikmd, compare it with