# copyparty vs whisper-asr-webservice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | whisper-asr-webservice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 47 168 ✓ | 3 367 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +395 ✓ | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.10.0 · 9 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 62/100 for whisper-asr-webservice, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for whisper-asr-webservice.

If you want the quickest setup, whisper-asr-webservice is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [whisper-asr-webservice](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisper-asr-webservice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisper-asr-webservice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-whisper-asr-webservice