copypartyvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 47 168 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +395 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with