# copyparty vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 47 170 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +387 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+387 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-url-to-png