# copyparty vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 ✓ | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 ✓ | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for unopim.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-unopim