copypartyvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 | 39 754 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | +773 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 82/100 for copyparty, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with