# copyparty vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted [File Sharing projects](https://selfhost.directory/file-sharing), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 47 150 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +377 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+377 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-transfersh