copypartyvsTinystatus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Tinystatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 47 181 | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +398 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tinystatus.
If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Tinystatus details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Tinystatus, compare it with