copypartyvstimesheet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | timesheet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #10 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 47 188 | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +405 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Vue |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 38/100 for timesheet, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timesheet.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+405 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →timesheet details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep timesheet, compare it with