# copyparty vs Deta Surf

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Deta Surf |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #21 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 47 184 ✓ | 3 612 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 59/100 for Deta Surf, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Deta Surf.

If you want the quickest setup, Deta Surf is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Deta Surf](https://selfhost.directory/project/surf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/surf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-surf