copypartyvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with