# copyparty vs solidtime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | solidtime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 47 181 ✓ | 9 056 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +398 ✓ | +128 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 69/100 for solidtime, so it is the safer default.

solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [solidtime](https://selfhost.directory/project/solidtime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/solidtime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-solidtime