# copyparty vs ScreenTinker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | ScreenTinker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 47 173 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ScreenTinker.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-screentinker