# copyparty vs Request Tracker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | copyparty | Request Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 47 184 ✓ | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)
- [Request Tracker](https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/copyparty-vs-request-tracker